Differences in Functional Capacity between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Populations: Reference Values.

This study is focused on the fact that in the context of increasing global aging and cancer diagnoses, additional challenges arise in clinical care. Adequate functionality and body composition are key to coping with antineoplastic treatment, which can lead to better treatment tolerance, survival, and quality of life. This is a cross-sectional comparative study focused on the assessment and comparison of body composition and functionality between cancer patients and a reference population, with the aim of establishing meaningful baseline values. Techniques such as manual dynamometry, the Five-Times Sit-to-Stand test, and bioimpedance were used to collect data from 374 oncologic patients and 1244 reference individuals. The results reveal significant disparities in functionality and body composition among participants, and provide age group-specific adjusted baseline values for those diagnosed with cancer. These findings may have crucial clinical implications for applying particular cut-off points designed for this population group, which makes the assessment process faster and more accurate, enhances the capacity of medical personnel to act quickly, and improves the management of frailty in cancer patients.

Association between Phase Angle and Subjective Perceptions of Health Variables in Cancer Patients.

The phase angle, an increasingly studied healthcare tool, was studied to explore its relationship with psychological factors in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the phase angle (PhA), obtained by the bioimpedance analysis of body composition, and psychological factors measured by questionnaire in cancer patients. The study included 311 patients who underwent bioimpedance testing to determine their PhA value; their psychological profiles were assessed using SF-36, FACIT, QLQ-C30, and GHQ-12 questionnaires. Mixed linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between PhA and the psychological tests. The results showed a statistical correlation between PhA and the GHQ-12, FACIT, and SF-36 questionnaires, with higher PhA values associated with better results on the questionnaires. In the QLQ-C30 questionnaire, a correlation was observed between PhA and the functioning scales (p < 0.001), except for emotional and cognitive functioning (p = 0.148 and p = 0.544, respectively), but not in most of the symptom scales. The PhA is a useful tool for assessing the subjective health perception of cancer patients, especially with regard to psychological factors. While there is a statistically significant correlation, further research is required before confidently applying it in clinical practice. The current predictive value of this predictor for certain psychological aspects is limited, underscoring the need for additional research.

Nurse-Supervised Exercise for People with Stage IV Cancer: The EFICANCER Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of the EFICANCER individualized and supervised exercise program for people with gastrointestinal, breast, or non-small cell lung stage IV cancer, in terms of quality of life and functional capacity. DATA SOURCES: Randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups: EFICANCER (n = 47) and control (n = 43). Both groups received standard oncological care. In addition, the EFICANCER group participated in a nurse-supervised exercise program. Primary outcome was cancer-specific (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) and general quality of life (SF-36) at baseline and after 2, 6, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were functional capacity (6-minute walking test), strength, and fatigue. The evolution in both groups was compared over 12 months using mixed-effect longitudinal models; 74.47% of patients completed at least one session of the program. At 12 months, EFICANCER group had better scores in cancer-related quality of life, with a difference between groups of 15.7 points (95% confidence interval 4.4 to 25.9) and in functional capacity, with a difference of 4.5 points (95% confidence interval -0.5 to 9.5). No significant differences in any other secondary variables were observed. CONCLUSION: The EFICANCER primary care nurse supervised exercise program is safe and feasible and improves cancer patient's outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Providing the best care and trying to improve the quality of life of cancer patients are essential parts of nursing practice. Eficancer adds a new dimension to nursing practice by providing greater attention and care to patients during treatment through the supervision of physical exercise, thereby contributing to improve the quality of life of this population.

Association between PhA and Physical Performance Variables in Cancer Patients.

Maintaining the physical performance of cancer patients is increasingly considered due to the growing number of cancer patients and the aggressiveness of the treatments. For this reason, bioimpedance is now being used to record patients' body composition by obtaining the phase angle (PhA). Although there is a direct relationship between PhA, age, sex and disease prognosis, it has not been measured as an analysis of physical performance in oncology patients and is a valid tool in the follow-up of cancer patients. For this purpose, 311 patients were evaluated, and both bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and physical performance measurements were performed. The modification of the results concerning PhA was found to be highly relational, as a variation in one of the variables affected the other. It was concluded that each degree increase in PhA modified -22.57 s [-27.58; -17.53] in 400-m walking test (400 mWT); 13.25 kg [10.13; 16.35] in upper-body strength (UBS); 6.3 [4.95; 7.65] in lower-body strength (LBS); 1.55 mL/kg/min [0.98; 2.12] in VO2peak; 6.53 Watts [3.83; 9.20] in ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1); 10.36 Watts [7.02; 13.64] in ventilatory threshold 2 (VT2). It was also noted that age was a factor that affected the relationship between PhA and 400 mWT; the older the age, the higher the relationship. PhA data has been shown to be highly correlated with physical performance. This is of great importance in clinical practice because a cancer patient's physical performance levels can be assessed during treatment.

Physiological and mental health changes in cancer patients during the COVID-19 state of emergency.

Backgrounds: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic that we are currently facing, many governments across the world have declared a state of emergency and even confinements. This stressful situation, in addition to prolonged stays at home, may imply a radical change in lifestyle behavior and physical activity (PA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the physiological and psychological effects in cancer patients who changed their PA habits during the COVID-19 state of emergency in Spain. Methods: Thirty-three participants were evaluated pre- and post-state of emergency. A series of questionnaires was used to assess cancer-specific quality of life. Results: The most relevant results revealed significantly lower walking time (p < 0.001) and sitting time (p = 0.014). Upper and lower body strength also decreased significantly (p = 0.009 and 0.012, respectively) and oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) (p = 0.023). None of the parameters analysed showed significant differences for psychological aspects (QLQ-C-30 and SF-36) and body composition. Conclusion: Lower physical activity leads to negative physiological adaptation, particularly affecting cardiovascular and strength levels. While it is important to maintain the general population's amount and intensity of exercise, this particularly vulnerable group's physical capacity is vital to their health and well-being.

Any increment in physical activity reduces mortality risk of physically inactive patients: prospective cohort study in primary care.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how engaging in physical activity after long periods of inactivity provides expected health benefits. AIM: To determine whether physically inactive primary care patients reduce their mortality risk by increasing physical activity, even in low doses. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort of 3357 physically inactive patients attending 11 Spanish public primary healthcare centres. METHOD: Change in physical activity was repeatedly measured during patients' participation in the 'Experimental Program for Physical Activity Promotion' clinical trial between 2003 and 2006, using the '7-day Physical Activity Recall'. Mortality to 31 December 2018 (312 deaths) was recorded from national statistics, and survival time from the end of the clinical trial analysed using proportional hazard models. RESULTS: After 46 191 person-years of follow-up, compared with individuals who remained physically inactive, the mortality rates of those who achieved the minimum recommendations of 150-300 min/week of moderate- or 75-150 min/week of vigorous-intensity exercise was reduced by 45% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.41 to 0.74); those who did not meet these recommendations but increased physical activity in low doses, that is, 50 min/week of moderate physical activity, showed a 31% reduced mortality (aHR 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.93); and, those who surpassed the recommendation saw a 49% reduction in mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.81). The inverse association between increased physical activity and mortality follows a continuous curvilinear dose-response relationship. CONCLUSION: Physically inactive primary care patients reduced their risk of mortality by increasing physical activity, even in doses below recommended levels. Greater reduction was achieved through meeting physical activity recommendations or adopting levels of physical activity higher than those recommended.

Barreras y facilitadores del programa de ejercicio EfiKroniK para pacientes con enfermedad crónica en atención primaria / Barriers and facilitators of the EfiKroniK exercise program for people with chronic diseases in Primary Care

Objetivo: Explorar las percepciones de los pacientes durante el programa de ejercicio y detectar las barreras y los facilitadores que influyen en la adherencia al ejercicio al término de la supervisión. Diseño: Estudio observacional cualitativo con grupos de discusión como principal técnica de recogida de datos. Lugar: Centros de atención primaria de Vizcaya. Participantes: De los 175 pacientes aleatorizados del ensayo híbrido de efectividad-implementación se incluyeron 19 pacientes del grupo intervención (12 pacientes oncohematológicos en estadios avanzados y 7 con trastorno mental grave). Métodos: Se ha realizado un análisis de contenido de las transcripciones generadas, combinando un enfoque deductivo, basado en los dominios del marco teórico PRACTIS y uno inductivo, basado en los postulados de la teoría fundamentada. Resultados: Los participantes se mostraron satisfechos con el programa EfiKroniK y los beneficios fueron: descubrimiento de los beneficios del ejercicio físico, la gestión psicológica y emocional de la enfermedad, los beneficios de la comunicación entre iguales y del apoyo emocional y romper con la rutina de la enfermedad. Los participantes disminuyeron los niveles de ejercicio físico al término de la supervisión por la confluencia de diferentes barreras. Conclusión:Un programa de ejercicio supervisado realizado en atención primaria contribuyó a mejorar la calidad de vida, el bienestar emocional y social de pacientes en estadios avanzados de su enfermedad. Nuestro estudio ha identificado barreras potenciales y facilitadores asociados con la participación en el ejercicio y su continuidad; sin embargo, es necesario promover la coordinación intersectorial en el espacio sociosanitario para fomentar una atención integrada y continuada a los pacientes crónicos.(AU)

Objective: Explore patients’ perceptions during a supervised exercise program and detect the barriers and facilitators that influence exercise adherence after the supervision period. Design: A qualitative observational study with three focus groups as the main data collection technique was conducted. Site: Primary Health centers of Bizkaia. Participants: Out of the 175 randomized patients in the hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial, a sample of 19 patients from the intervention group were included in the qualitative study (12 advanced-stage onco-haematological patients and seven with severe mental disorders). Methods: Content analysis of the generated transcripts was performed by combining a deductive approach, based on the domains of the PRACTIS theoretical framework, and an inductive one, based on the postulates of the Grounded Theory. Results: The data analysis showed that participants were satisfied with the EfiKroniK program and that the main identified benefits were discovery of the benefits of physical exercise, the psychological and emotional management of the disease, the benefits from peer communication and emotional support, and the break from routine of their illness. Participants decreased the levels of physical exercise at the end of the supervision6 due to the confluence of several barriers. Conclusion: A supervised exercise program carried out in Primary Care contributed to the improvement of the quality of life as well as the emotional and social well-being of patients with advanced-stage diseases. Our study identified potential barriers and facilitators associated with exercise participation and its continuity, however, it is necessary to encourage inter-sectoral coordination within the socio-health system to promote integrated and continuous care for chronic patients.(AU)

[Barriers and facilitators of the EfiKroniK exercise program for people with chronic diseases in Primary Care]. / Barreras y facilitadores del programa de ejercicio EfiKroniK para pacientes con enfermedad crónica en atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: Explore patients' perceptions during a supervised exercise program and detect the barriers and facilitators that influence exercise adherence after the supervision period. DESIGN: A qualitative observational study with three focus groups as the main data collection technique was conducted. SITE: Primary Health centers of Bizkaia. PARTICIPANTS: Out of the 175 randomized patients in the hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial, a sample of 19 patients from the intervention group were included in the qualitative study (12 advanced-stage onco-haematological patients and seven with severe mental disorders). METHODS: Content analysis of the generated transcripts was performed by combining a deductive approach, based on the domains of the PRACTIS theoretical framework, and an inductive one, based on the postulates of the Grounded Theory. RESULTS: The data analysis showed that participants were satisfied with the EfiKroniK program and that the main identified benefits were discovery of the benefits of physical exercise, the psychological and emotional management of the disease, the benefits from peer communication and emotional support, and the break from routine of their illness. Participants decreased the levels of physical exercise at the end of the supervision6 due to the confluence of several barriers. CONCLUSION: A supervised exercise program carried out in Primary Care contributed to the improvement of the quality of life as well as the emotional and social well-being of patients with advanced-stage diseases. Our study identified potential barriers and facilitators associated with exercise participation and its continuity, however, it is necessary to encourage inter-sectoral coordination within the socio-health system to promote integrated and continuous care for chronic patients.

Implementing Exercise in Standard Cancer Care (Bizi Orain Hybrid Exercise Program): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the established benefits of regular exercise for patients with cancer to counteract the deleterious effects of the disease itself and treatment-related adverse effects, most of them do not engage in sufficient levels of physical activity and there is a paucity of data on the integration of efficacious exercise programs that are accessible and generalizable to a large proportion of patients with cancer into routine cancer care. OBJECTIVE: We intend to examine the effects attributable to the implementation of a community-based exercise program on cardiorespiratory functional capacity and quality of life for patients with cancer. METHODS: This will be a hybrid study. In the first experimental phase, patients diagnosed with any type of cancer will be randomized into two parallel groups. One group immediately performs Bizi Orain, a 3-month supervised exercise program (3 times a week), in addition to behavioral counseling in a primary health care setting; the other is a reference group that starts the exercise program 3 months later (delayed treatment). In the second observational phase, the entire cohort of participants will be followed-up for 5 years. Any person diagnosed with cancer in the previous 2 years is eligible for the program. The program evaluation involves the uptake, safety, adherence, and effectiveness assessed after completion of the program and with follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. The primary outcomes of the experimental study, to be compared between groups, are improved physical function and quality of life, whereas overall survival is the main objective of the prospective study. To analyze the association between changes in physical activity levels and overall survival, longitudinal mixed-effects models will be used for repeated follow-up measures. RESULTS: A total of 265 patients have been enrolled into the study since January 2019, with 42 patients from the hematology service and 223 from the oncology service. CONCLUSIONS: Bizi Orain is the first population-based exercise program in Spain that will offer more insight into the implementation of feasible, generalizable, and sustainable supportive care services involving structured exercise to extend survival of patients with cancer, improve their physical function and quality of life, and reverse the adverse effects of their disease and related treatments, thereby reducing the clinical burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03819595; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03819595. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24835.

Effectiveness of physical exercise for people with chronic diseases: the EFIKRONIK study protocol for a hybrid, clinical and implementation randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic illnesses are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality and threaten the sustainability of healthcare systems worldwide. There is limited evidence in terms of the best modality and intensity of physical activity for improving cardiorespiratory capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic conditions. The objective of the EfiKroniK study is to estimate the common effect of innovative, individualized and supervised physical exercise, on cardiorespiratory functional capacity and quality of life across people with different chronic conditions. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicentre clinical trial with a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, including 370 patients each with one of four different chronic illnesses: solid cancer, blood cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or schizophrenia. Patients will be randomly divided into two parallel groups, stratified by illness type. Patients in both groups will receive a standard healthy life prescription (PVS, from the Spanish "Prescribe Vida Saludable") and additionally, the EfiKroniK group will be prescribed a physical exercise programme tailored to each patient in terms of intensity in each session. The primary outcome variables will be cardiorespiratory functional capacity and quality of life. The secondary outcome variables will be signs and symptoms, psychological and social factors and specific laboratory parameters. We will also analyse the dose-response effect of the physical exercise programme. Qualitative variables will describe patients' perception of the utility and suitability of the EfiKroniK programme, as well as their expectations and satisfaction, identifying barriers to and facilitators of the EfiKroniK implementation process through discussion groups. The study will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing changes throughout the 1-year follow-up between groups, adjusting for baseline, by performing mixed-effect analysis of covariance. We will estimate the effect of time on repeated measures in each subject and changes in the EfiKroniK and PVS groups over time. DISCUSSION: The study will provide the data necessary to allow us to prescribe physical exercise in a similar way to a drug and as a key part of the treatment of chronic illnesses within our healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03810755 . Date and version identifier: October 9, 2020. Version2.0.

EVIDENT Smartphone App, a New Method for the Dietary Record: Comparison With a Food Frequency Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: More alternatives are needed for recording people's normal diet in different populations, especially adults or the elderly, as part of the investigation into the effects of nutrition on health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the estimated values of energy intake, macro- and micronutrient, and alcohol consumption gathered using the EVIDENT II smartphone app against the data estimated with a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in an adult population aged 18 to 70 years. METHODS: We included 362 individuals (mean age 52 years, SD 12; 214/362, 59.1% women) who were part of the EVIDENT II study. The participants registered their food intake using the EVIDENT app during a period of 3 months and through an FFQ. Both methods estimate the average nutritional composition, including energy intake, macro- and micronutrients, and alcohol. Through the app, the values of the first week of food recording, the first month, and the entire 3-month period were estimated. The FFQ gathers data regarding the food intake of the year before the moment of interview. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation for the estimation of energy intake with the FFQ and the app shows significant results, with the highest values returned when analyzing the app's data for the full 3-month period (.304, 95% CI 0.144-0.434; P<.001). For this period, the correlation coefficient for energy intake is .233 (P<.001). The highest value corresponds to alcohol consumption and the lowest to the intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (r=.676 and r=.155; P<.001), respectively. The estimation of daily intake of energy, macronutrients, and alcohol presents higher values in the FFQ compared with the EVIDENT app data. Considering the values recorded during the 3-month period, the FFQ for energy intake estimation (Kcal) was higher than that of the app (a difference of 408.7, 95% CI 322.7-494.8; P<.001). The same is true for the other macronutrients, with the exception g/day of saturated fatty acids (.4, 95% CI -1.2 to 2.0; P=.62). CONCLUSIONS: The EVIDENT app is significantly correlated to FFQ in the estimation of energy intake, macro- and micronutrients, and alcohol consumption. This correlation increases with longer app recording periods. The EVIDENT app can be a good alternative for recording food intake in the context of longitudinal or intervention studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02016014; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02016014 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/760i8EL8Q).

Long-Term Effectiveness of a Smartphone App for Improving Healthy Lifestyles in General Population in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial (Evident II Study).

BACKGROUND: Information and communication technologies are currently among the supporting elements that may contribute to improving health and changing lifestyles. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of adding an app to standardized counseling in order to increase physical activity (PA) and adherence to the Mediterranean diet and to analyze the effects of app adherence in lifestyle changes. METHODS: A randomized, multicenter clinical trial with a 12 month-follow up was conducted, involving 833 participants recruited by random sampling in 6 primary Spanish care centers (415 vs 418). Counseling on PA and the Mediterranean diet was given to both groups by a research nurse; however, the counseling + app group (intervention group) received additional training in the use of an app that was designed to promote the Mediterranean diet and PA over a 3-month period. Main outcomes and measures included PA by accelerometer and the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (PAR) questionnaire and adherence to the Mediterranean diet by an adherence screener questionnaire. We considered adherence to the app to be high when it was used for more than 60 days. RESULTS: The mean age was 51 years (SD 12) in the intervention group and 52.3 years (SD 12.0) in the counseling-only group; females predominated in both groups (60.0%, 249/415 and 64.1%, 268/418, respectively). PA by accelerometer declined in both groups at 12 months (P value for tendency in moderate to vigorous PA, [MVPA]=.15). The intervention subgroup with high app adherence had better behavior than the low adherence subgroup (P value for tendency in MVPA=.001). PA analyzed by 7-day PAR did not show changes at 12 months in any of the groups (P value for tendency=.25). In the Mediterranean diet, an increase in adherence was observed in both groups at 12 months with no differences between them (P value for tendency=.46). In these two cases, the group with high app adherence also had better behavior, although without reaching significance for the tendency (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The participants with strongest app adherence showed better outcomes in terms of maintenance of healthy lifestyles at 12 months than those with weaker adherence. Overall, however, we found no differences between intervention group and counseling-only group in PA increase and adherence to the Mediterranean diet in the long term.

Short-Term Effectiveness of a Mobile Phone App for Increasing Physical Activity and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial (EVIDENT II Study).

BACKGROUND: The use of mobile phone apps for improving lifestyles has become generalized in the population, although little is still known about their effectiveness in improving health. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the effect of adding an app to standard counseling on increased physical activity (PA) and adherence to the Mediterranean diet, 3 months after implementation. METHODS: A randomized, multicenter clinical trial was carried out. A total of 833 participants were recruited in six primary care centers in Spain through random sampling: 415 in the app+counseling group and 418 in the counseling only group. Counseling on PA and the Mediterranean diet was given to both groups. The app+counseling participants additionally received training in the use of an app designed to promote PA and the Mediterranean diet over a 3-month period. PA was measured with the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (PAR) questionnaire and an accelerometer; adherence to the Mediterranean diet was assessed using the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly female in both the app+counseling (249/415, 60.0%) and counseling only (268/418, 64.1%) groups, with a mean age of 51.4 (SD 12.1) and 52.3 (SD 12.0) years, respectively. Leisure-time moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by 7-day PAR increased in the app+counseling (mean 29, 95% CI 5-53 min/week; P=.02) but not in the counseling only group (mean 17.4, 95% CI -18 to 53 min/week; P=.38). No differences in increase of activity were found between the two groups. The accelerometer recorded a decrease in PA after 3 months in both groups: MVPA mean -55.3 (95% CI -75.8 to -34.9) min/week in app+counseling group and mean -30.1 (95% CI -51.8 to -8.4) min/week in counseling only group. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet increased in both groups (8.4% in app+counseling and 10.4% in counseling only group), with an increase in score of 0.42 and 0.53 points, respectively (P<.001), but no difference between groups (P=.86). CONCLUSIONS: Leisure-time MVPA increased more in the app+counseling than counseling only group, although no difference was found when comparing the increase between the two groups. Counseling accompanied by printed materials appears to be effective in improving adherence to the Mediterranean diet, although the app does not increase adherence. CLINICALTRIAL: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02016014; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02016014 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6mnopADbf).

Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: The use of brief screening tools to identify inactive patients is essential to improve the efficiency of primary care-based physical activity (PA) programs. However, the current employment of short PA questionnaires within the Spanish primary care pathway is unclear. This study evaluated the validity of the Spanish version of a Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool (SBPAAT). METHODS: A validation study was carried out within the EVIDENT project. A convenience sample of patients (n = 1,184; age 58.9±13.7 years; 60.5% female) completed the SBPAAT and the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (7DPAR) and, in addition, wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) for seven consecutive days. Validity was evaluated by measuring agreement, Kappa correlation coefficients, sensitivity and specificity in achieving current PA recommendations with the 7DPAR. Pearson correlation coefficients with the number of daily minutes engaged in moderate and vigorous intensity PA according to the accelerometer were also assessed. Comparison with accelerometer counts, daily minutes engaged in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensity PA, total daily kilocalories, and total PA and leisure time expenditure (METs-hour-week) between the sufficiently and insufficiently active groups identified by SBPAAT were reported. RESULTS: The SBPAAT identified 41.3% sufficiently active (n = 489) and 58.7% insufficiently active (n = 695) patients; it showed moderate validity (k = 0.454, 95% CI: 0.402-0.505) and a specificity and sensitivity of 74.3% and 74.6%, respectively. Validity was fair for identifying daily minutes engaged in moderate (r = 0.215, 95% CI:0.156 to 0.272) and vigorous PA (r = 0.282, 95% CI:0.165 to 0.391). Insufficiently active patients according to the SBPAAT significantly reported fewer counts/minute (-22%), fewer minutes/day of moderate (-11.38) and vigorous PA (-2.69), spent fewer total kilocalories/day (-753), and reported a lower energy cost (METs-hour-week) of physical activities globally (-26.82) and during leisure time (-19.62). CONCLUSIONS: The SBPAAT is a valid tool to identify Spanish-speaking patients who are insufficiently active to achieve health benefits.

Clustering of lifestyle characteristics and their association with cardio-metabolic health: the Lifestyles and Endothelial Dysfunction (EVIDENT) study.

Little is known about the clustering patterns of lifestyle behaviours in adult populations. We explored clusters in multiple lifestyle behaviours including physical activity (PA), smoking, alcohol use and eating habits in a sample of adult population. A cross-sectional and multi-centre study was performed with six participating groups distributed throughout Spain. Participants (n 1327) were part of the Lifestyles and Endothelial Dysfunction (EVIDENT) study and were aged between 20 and 80 years. The lifestyle and cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors were analysed using a clustering method based on the HJ-biplot coordinates to understand the variables underlying these groupings. The following three clusters were identified. Cluster 1: unhealthy, 677 subjects (51%), with a slight majority of men (58.7%), who were more sedentary and smokers with higher consumption of whole-fat dairy products, bigger waist circumference as well as higher TAG levels, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and CVR. Cluster 2: healthy/PA, 265 subjects (20%), including 24.0% of males with high PA. Cluster 3: healthy/diet, including 29% of the participants, with a higher consumption of olive oil, fish, fruits, nuts, vegetables and lower alcohol consumption. Using the unhealthy cluster as a reference, and after adjusting for age and sex, the multiple regression analysis showed that belonging to the healthy/PA cluster was associated with a lower waist circumference, body fat percentage, SBP and CVR. In summary, the three clusters were identified according to lifestyles. The 'unhealthy' cluster had the least favourable clinical parameters, the 'healthy/PA' cluster had good HDL-cholesterol levels and low SBP and the 'healthy/diet' cluster had lower LDL-cholesterol levels and clinical blood pressure.

La investigación al alcance de los profesionales de Osakidetza: Programa de Investigación en Atención Primaria de Salud / Research within the reach of Osakidetza professionals: Primary Health Care Research Program

OBJETIVO: Describir el proceso y resultados del Programa de Investigación en Atención Primaria de Salud 2010-2011, organizado por la Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Bizkaia. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo. Emplazamiento: Atención primaria del servicio público de salud Osakidetza. Participantes: Un total de 107 profesionales que solicitaron participar entre los 4.338 médicos/as, enfermeros/as y personal administrativo a los que se difundió el programa. Mediciones principales: Nivel de participación, clasificación de los temas de investigación, valoración del programa por los participantes, financiación de los proyectos generados y costes del programa. RESULTADOS: La proporción de profesionales que solicitaron participar en el programa fue de un 2,47%; IC 95% 2,41-2,88%. Se seleccionaron 28 de ellos y lo finalizaron 19. Los temas a investigar están mayoritariamente relacionados con los problemas de salud crónicos más frecuentes (32%) y la prevención y promoción de la salud (18%). Más del 90% de los participantes evaluó como buena o excelente la calidad del programa y la mitad lo consideró difícil o muy difícil. Se generaron 18 proyectos nuevos, de los que 12 obtuvieron financiación, con 16 ayudas, 10 del Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco, 4 del Instituto de Salud Carlos III y 2 del Instituto Kronikgune, captando 500.000 € para dichos proyectos. Los costes totales del programa ascendieron a 198.327 €. CONCLUSIONES: Esta experiencia puede servir para otros interesados en el fomento de la investigación en atención primaria de salud (APS), ya que el programa ha logrado sus objetivos, es útil y productivo

OBJECTIVE: To provide information about the process and results of the Primary Health Care Research Program 2010-2011 organised by the Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia. DESIGN: Descriptive study. Setting: Osakidetza primary care. Participants: The 107 health professionals who applied for the program from a total of 4,338general practitioners, nurses and administrative staff who were informed about it. Main measures: Application level, research topics classification, program evaluation by participants, projects funding and program costs. RESULTS: Percentage who applied, 2.47%; 95% CI 2.41-2.88%. Of the 28 who were selected and 19 completed. The research topics were mostly related to the more common chronic diseases (32%), and prevention and health promotion (18%). Over 90% of participants assessed the quality of the program as good or excellent, and half of them considered it as difficult or very difficult. Of the18 new projects generated, 12 received funding, with 16 grants, 10 from the Health Department of the Basque Government, 4 from the Carlos III Institute of Health of the Ministry of Health of Spain, and 2 from Kronikgune. A total of € 500,000 was obtained for these projects. This program cost € 198,327. CONCLUSIONS: This experience can be used by others interested in the promotion of research in primary care, as the program achieved its objectives, and was useful and productive

[Research within the reach of Osakidetza professionals: Primary Health Care Research Program]. / La investigación al alcance de los profesionales de Osakidetza: Programa de Investigación en Atención Primaria de Salud.

OBJECTIVE: To provide information about the process and results of the Primary Health Care Research Program 2010-2011 organised by the Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Osakidetza primary care. PARTICIPANTS: The 107 health professionals who applied for the program from a total of 4,338 general practitioners, nurses and administrative staff who were informed about it. MAIN MEASURES: Application level, research topics classification, program evaluation by participants, projects funding and program costs. RESULTS: Percentage who applied, 2.47%; 95% CI 2.41-2.88%. Of the 28 who were selected and 19 completed. The research topics were mostly related to the more common chronic diseases (32%), and prevention and health promotion (18%). Over 90% of participants assessed the quality of the program as good or excellent, and half of them considered it as difficult or very difficult. Of the18 new projects generated, 12 received funding, with 16 grants, 10 from the Health Department of the Basque Government, 4 from the Carlos III Institute of Health of the Ministry of Health of Spain, and 2 from Kronikgune. A total of €500,000 was obtained for these projects. This program cost €198,327. CONCLUSIONS: This experience can be used by others interested in the promotion of research in primary care, as the program achieved its objectives, and was useful and productive.